Integration and automation

Connect systems.

When information sits in several tools, handovers cost time and obscure progress. LDS examines how those systems can work together reliably.

Discuss a project

One possible application

Less manual work.

Hand over ordersIllustrative example

Order

Item
Product A
Quantity
40 units
Checked · approved

By a team member

Software

Planning

Product A40 units

Transferred automatically

Accounting

Product A40 units

Transferred automatically

No repeated typingApprove → transfer automatically
Before development, LDS checks which handovers are useful and technically feasible.

What a useful connection must do.

In this example, an approved order moves to planning and billing. Teams need to see what arrived and what still needs their attention.

Person reviewing a table on a laptop
  1. Approve once, pass on what is needed

    The responsible person approves the order. Planning and billing receive only the details they need for their next step.

  2. Keep exceptions visible

    If a field is missing or a target system rejects the order, the case remains visible with a status and an owner.

  3. Prevent duplicate orders

    After an interruption, a retry must not quietly create a second order. The available checks depend on the systems involved.

  4. Plan for change

    When a field or interface changes, the transfer needs to be adapted and checked again. Ongoing responsibilities are agreed.

After the first transfer

What if the order changes later?

An approved order has already reached planning and billing. Its quantity then changes. The teams need to know which version is valid.

  1. Identify

    Distinguish old and new

    The change must stay linked to the original order rather than appearing as a separate second order.

  2. Compare

    Check the affected steps

    Has planning already acted or billing posted the transaction? Depending on the state, the teams may need an update, a cancellation or a human decision.

  3. Clarify

    Show the valid state

    Teams need to see which version to use and which change remains open. The authoritative source and responsibilities are established.

Illustrative change scenario, not an existing LDS integration. Delivery depends on the systems and their interfaces.

Engineering Expertise

Technology Expertise

LDS selects languages, databases, EU hosting, enterprise integrations, AI model families, and frontend or DevOps tools to fit each enterprise environment and its security needs.

Languages

  • TypeScript / JavaScript & Node.js
  • Python
  • Go
Show more technologies

Key technologies

  • C# / .NET
  • Java

Additional technologies

  • Rust
  • PHP
  • Kotlin
  • Bash / Shell
  • Supabase Edge Functions / Deno

Selected for type safety, maintainability, and operational performance across core business logic.

Databases

  • PostgreSQL / SQL
  • MySQL
  • MariaDB
Show more technologies

Key technologies

  • Microsoft SQL Server
  • MongoDB
  • Redis
  • Valkey
  • SQLite

Additional technologies

  • ClickHouse
  • OpenSearch / Elasticsearch
  • Qdrant
  • pgvector
  • Supabase & Row Level Security (RLS)

Chosen to match transactional requirements, data structure complexity, and consistency demands.

EU Hosting

  • STACKIT
  • IONOS Cloud
  • Scaleway
Show more technologies

Additional technologies

  • OVHcloud
  • Hetzner
  • Aiven

Configured for local data residency and infrastructure control according to project requirements.

Architecture Notes

Provider, region, and database engine are separate choices, and EU hosting alone does not guarantee GDPR compliance.

Enterprise Integrations

  • SAP RFC / OData
  • Microsoft Dynamics
  • Salesforce APIs
Show more technologies

Key technologies

  • REST & gRPC
  • Stripe

Additional technologies

  • GraphQL
  • Webhooks
  • Apache Kafka
  • RabbitMQ
  • MQTT

Engineered to connect legacy software, ERP systems, and third-party APIs without data disruption.

AI Model Families

  • OpenAI GPT
  • Anthropic Claude
  • Google Gemini
Show more technologies

Key technologies

  • Grok
  • Mistral
  • DeepSeek
  • Qwen
  • Kimi
  • GLM
  • MiniMax

Additional technologies

  • Meta Llama
  • Google Gemma
  • Cohere Command

Selected to execute targeted automation tasks while respecting defined data boundaries.

Architecture Notes

AI provider, model, region, and licensing are checked per project.

Frontend & DevOps Tools

  • React & Next.js
  • Vite & Tailwind CSS
  • TanStack Query
Show more technologies

Key technologies

  • i18next / next-intl

Additional technologies

  • Docker
  • Kubernetes
  • CI/CD
  • Sentry
  • Playwright
  • ESLint

Selected to deliver functional user interfaces and automated deployment workflows.

Common questions

Can every application be connected?

This needs to be checked beforehand. Available interfaces, export functions, access permissions and terms of use determine what is possible.

What happens if something goes wrong?

Error detection, notifications, recovery and responsibilities are agreed for each connection.

Which handover takes too much time?

Discuss a project